Weblog
Monday, 11 February 2008
-
For Whom Would Jesus Vote?
What Jesus cares most about are the abortion and gay marriage issues. That is the linchpin upon which the whole election should be decided?!?! Well, not really!
What if we just took some time to listen to what Jesus said? Actually read the Bible for once. Focused on what the Bible emphasizes and what God stresses, and not what the religious pundits assert. To think that being "Conservative" equals being faithful to Christ is a form of religious/anti-gospel delusion. It's an expression of legalistic moralism in the public sphere.
Remember that a "Christian" Nation is a dangerous thing. Not
only for the world, but for the Church as well. Power corrupts the
gospel because we are called to be the meek. This is why a clear
separation of Church and State is good for both. I think in
the same vein a "Christian" candidate is just as dangerous. This, of
course, is very different than a candidate who happens to be Christian. (Read my blog for more)
Here are some links to stimulate our theological-political minds:
Tony Campolo calls for a political movement of 'Red-Letter Christians', people who simply take Jesus' words seriously:"Believing that Jesus is neither a Republican nor a Democrat, we want to unite Christians who are concerned about what is happening in America. We are evangelicals who are troubled by what is happening to poor people in America; who are disturbed over environmental policies that are contributing to global warming; who are dismayed over the increasing arrogance of power shown in our country’s militarism; who are outraged because government funding is being reduced for school where students, often from impoverished and dysfunctional homes, are testing poorly; who are upset with the fact that of the 22 industrialized nations America is next to last in the proportion of its national budget (less than two-tenths of 1 percent) that is designated to help the poor of third-world countries; and who are broken-hearted over discrimination against women, people of color, and those who suffer because of their sexual orientation." (What is a 'Red-Letter Christian'? by Tony Campolo)
Also, here is a great article in Christianity Today about how "Single-issue politics is neither necessary nor wise."
Here is a thought provoking speech by Barack Obama on the role of faith in politics: "Call to Renewal Keynote Address"

Currently Reading
Red Letter Christians: A Citizen's Guide to Faith and Politics
By Tony Campolo
see related
Friday, 09 November 2007
-
AA as Gospel Community?
When things get stressful do you think to yourself, "I really need to double up on church services!"? That's what I heard from this girl who became a drug addict and is now going to Alcoholics Anonymous. In fact, she says that AA changed her life. Many have commented that AA provides the best community experience in America, where as churches provide one of the worst.
In AA, everyone openly admits that they are seriously in trouble, and in need. They gather together as "sinners," who will have to continue to seek help for the rest of their lives. They freely confess to one another, graciously accept each other, and humbly seek God (Higher Power in AA lingo) together.
In most churches (of course, there are many gospel churches out there) you are considered "a saint" presently. Maybe you've struggle with sin in the past, but transformed by the power of God, you are now in a position to minister to others, not seek help yourself. Unlike Paul, who thought of himself as a great sinner to his last days, modern churches thinks of sinners as people "out there" or people that we once were. Many simply become very good at hiding their sin. Therefore, when an occurence of real and present sin is revealed in the church, everyone is shocked.
If the church desires to grow as a Gospel community, it would benefit from AA's lessons: We gather as sinners in need, not as saints who are beyond that. We never outgrow the basic Gospel message of sin, Christ and forgiveness, even in "maturity." We are real sinners with real sins. Of course, God transforms, but we are still always and ever in desperate need of Christ. This was the great insight of Dietrich Bonhoeffer in Life Together, when he talked about the Cross and confession being a breakthrough to Gospel community. Unlike AA, however, the church should be Sinners Onymous because we are not afraid to be sinners and public witnesses to the grace that we receive.

Currently Reading
Life Together: The Classic Exploration of Faith in Community
By Dietrich Bonhoeffer
see related
Monday, 05 November 2007
-
Blasphemous truths, Pious Lies
Luther says, "there are none nearer to God in this life than these haters and blasphemers of Him, nor any sons more pleasing to him and beloved by him! ... Like Job, the 'blasphemer' at least does God the honor of acknowledging God as God. In extremity the sufferer is finally provoked enough, perhaps ultimately in death, to send complaint to the right address. Perhaps we can imagine God saying, "Ah, at last! I got you to talk to me! You spoke the truth about me in spite of yourself!"... As with Job, the situation is such that suffering leads to truthful speech..."
Isn't it strange that Job accuses God of so much, yet he is credited with truthful speech, whereas his friends with their religious platitudes are rebuked by God? As Luther says elsewhere, ‘‘the curses of the godless sometimes sound better in God’s ear than the hallelujahs of the pious.’’
It seems that it's in vogue to be an atheist these days and considering these thoughts of Luther, I can't help but wonder if God would be more pleased with the raw honesty of these "blasphemers" than the religious piety of the so-called Christians. The truthful atheist says, if God is so oppressive, I'd rather raise my fist and fight God because I can't accept that kind of a God. The deceitful religious person says, even though God is so oppressive, I'd rather just stay quiet and give him lip-service all the while, seeking to get away with the minimum duty so as not to get in trouble. In this case, I can see how God would prefer the honesty of the atheist. Because his faith is more integrated with who he really is, that atheist has a better chance of really connected with God.
...of course, the gospel person says, in the midst of my oppressive experience, God is still for me and is good because of the cross, but that's a different post...
Currently Reading
On Being a Theologian of the Cross: Reflections on Luther's Heidelberg Disputation, 1518 (Theology)
By Gerhard O. Forde, Martin Luther
see related
Thursday, 27 September 2007
-
Not Grace, Not Even the Gospel...
To say that "prayer works" is damned nonsense. While it is hard to overemphasize the importance of prayer or scripture, it is possible to talk about them in an idolatrous manner. Prayer, in of itself, is nothing. It is the divine Subject that makes this frail and fallible human action into something powerful. God is the One who works and is powerful, but His ways are so often, not our ways.
Whenever we treat prayer, scripture, or any other spiritual discipline as though they are important in of themselves, we disconnect them from God and make them into abstractions. Damned abstractions! Remember that satan doesn't really care if we are spiritual or not as long as we are not connected to God. If spiritual things distract us from God while deluding us to feel as though we are close to Him, so much the better.
In the end, grace or even the gospel can be made into an abstract idea. Once that happens we can lord over it and use it for our purposes. That's why it's possible for even grace-oriented, gospel-centered ministries to seem godless and oppressive at times. The way to avoid this kind of abstraction is to make sure that all these things lead us to a deeper communion with the Person of Jesus Christ, not just giving use some sort of a spiritual experience.“The last word I have to say…is not a concept like ‘grace’ but a name: Jesus Christ. He is grace, and he is the final thing, beyond the world, the Church and also beyond theology. We cannot capture him, but we have to do with him, and what I have sought to do in my long life is… to highlight this name and say: there…!”-Karl Barth on his last radio interview

Currently Reading
The Screwtape Letters
By C. S. Lewis
see related
Thursday, 06 September 2007
-
Truths for Parenting IV (Attachment)
Attachment Parenting (Questioning "Cry It Out" Approach)
Using a cross-disciplinary approach, examining brain function, emotional learning in infants, and cultural differences, the researchers at the Harvard Medical School's Department of Psychiatry concluded that babies need touch and attention and that "cry it out" approach is bad for them. No Duh! Surprising many Christians support this "Cry It Out" parenting because it seems to lead to a more "submissive" baby.
"Parents should recognize that
having their babies cry unnecessarily harms the baby permanently. It
changes the nervous system so they're overly sensitive to future
trauma. ...We've stressed independence so much
that it's having some very negative side effects...Parents should feel
free to sleep with
their infant children, to keep their toddlers nearby, perhaps on a
mattress in
the same room, and to comfort a baby when it cries...There are ways to
grow
up and be independent without putting babies through this trauma...My
advice is to keep the kids secure so they can grow up and take
some risks." (link to the Harvard University Gazette article)
What is the church's role in all this? Well, if nothing else, more communal support for the family and especially mothers. Parenting is so hard, just physically exhausting at times. A wider community is essential for the well being of the baby and the whole family. We can't just leave all these issues for Orpah, Dr. Phil, Super Nanny, and etc. Doesn't the gospel of grace and truth say something about these issues?
click here for more gospel v. religious parenting
Check out this really amazing episode from This American Life with Ira Glass about love between parents and children. "[During] the early Twentieth Century, a whole school of mental health professionals decided that unconditional love was a terrible thing to give a child. The government printed pamphlets warning mothers against the dangers of holding their kids. The head of the American Psychological Association and even a mothers' organization endorsed the position that mothers were dangerous..." click here for the free mp3 download

Currently Reading
The Attachment Parenting Book : A Commonsense Guide to Understanding and Nurturing Your Baby
By William Sears, Martha Sears
see related
- browse entries:
- older »

